Erratum: “Evaluating computer‐aided detection algorithms”

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134826/1/mp5750.pd

Classifier design for computerâ aided diagnosis: Effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135032/1/mp8805.pd

Combined adaptive enhancement and regionâ growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134789/1/mp8658.pd

Is this model reliable for everyone? Testing for strong calibration

In a well-calibrated risk prediction model, the average predicted probability is close to the true event rate for any given subgroup. Such models are reliable across heterogeneous populations and satisfy strong notions of algorithmic fairness. However, the task of auditing a model for strong calibration is well-known to be difficult -- particularly for machine learning (ML) algorithms -- due to the sheer number of potential subgroups. As such, common practice is to only assess calibration with respect to a few predefined subgroups. Recent developments in goodness-of-fit testing offer potential solutions but are not designed for settings with weak signal or where the poorly calibrated subgroup is small, as they either overly subdivide the data or fail to divide the data at all. We introduce a new testing procedure based on the following insight: if we can reorder observations by their expected residuals, there should be a change in the association between the predicted and observed residuals along this sequence if a poorly calibrated subgroup exists. This lets us reframe the problem of calibration testing into one of changepoint detection, for which powerful methods already exist. We begin with introducing a sample-splitting procedure where a portion of the data is used to train a suite of candidate models for predicting the residual, and the remaining data are used to perform a score-based cumulative sum (CUSUM) test. To further improve power, we then extend this adaptive CUSUM test to incorporate cross-validation, while maintaining Type I error control under minimal assumptions. Compared to existing methods, the proposed procedure consistently achieved higher power in simulation studies and more than doubled the power when auditing a mortality risk prediction model

Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134879/1/mp1892.pd

Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: Fusion of twoâ view information

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135080/1/mp6098.pd

Automated registration of breast lesions in temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysisâ local affine transformation for improved localization

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134991/1/mp6134.pd

Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation measures and morphological features

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135119/1/mp1548.pd

Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: Computerâ aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135117/1/mp2242.pd

A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134986/1/mp0069.pd